Overall, the Radeon HD XT stayed sufficiently close to the GeForce GT for most of the non-taxing benchmarks to be a viable alternative though we won’t recommend either card for aspiring gamers. What it does not have is the distinctive ring bus memory architecture; ATI has replaced this with a suitably low-end traditional bit memory bus that may put it at a slight bandwidth disadvantage against NVIDIA’s typicallybit memory bus based cards in the upper range of the entry-level GeForce 8 cards like the GeForce Iris Pro Graphics We show the least amount of ads whenever possible. Quake 3 Arena – Timedemo GeForce GT Desktop.
|Date Added:||3 January 2013|
|File Size:||63.93 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
ATI Radeon HD XT Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database
As both companies have reiterated quite often, the goal now is to develop a card to meet the growing high definition multimedia needs of consumers, especially for the mainstream and low-end segments where it is not so much a choice between ATI and NVIDIA as one between integrated and discrete graphics.
Iris Plus Graphics Compared to the Desktop XT the Mobility version has a MHz slower memory and core clock and is therefore a bit slower.
Radeon R9 MX Crossfire. Radeon HD M Crossfire.
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
In short, raseon money is in the potentially huge volume of the mainstream segment, for both desktop and mobile versions. GeForce Go GT. Radeon R7 Cores Kaveri Desktop.
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. HD Graphics Ivy Bridge. Conclusion Conclusion ATI’s mainstream volley of DirectX 10 graphics cards consisting of two models each in the mid-range Radeon HD series and the low-end budget Radeon HD series brings along much needed competition to the largest market segment in the graphics business.
Radeon HD 2400 XT
HD Graphics Cherry Trail. You can refer to our article on the R for more architectural details, as they are mostly similar for all the Radeon HD series.
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. HD Graphics Bay Trail. You may also be interested in To be mentioned is also the bit wide ringbus.
Intel too has been working on its integrated solutions in a similar direction with its Clear Video technology. Further, the chip ought to be a higher clocked version of the normal Mobility Radeon HD With no real testing done yet, we can’t say for sure whether ATI’s claims of a more complete video decoder that provides hardware support for both H. Naturally, with its smaller core and transistor count, power consumption is rated far xy than the Radeon HD XT at a very nice 25W.
As xg reviews and benchmarks have shown, the highly anticipated ATI Radeon HD XT R has not been the world-beater that some enthusiasts have been hoping for. At the moment, we feel that ATI has the slight edge in this aspect, mainly due to its integration of a HD audio controller so as to provide HDMI support and HDCP compliance throughout the entire family without relying on external factors. Quake 3 Arena – Timedemo ATI’s mainstream volley of DirectX 10 graphics cards consisting of two models each in the mid-range Radeon HD series and the low-end budget Radeon HD series brings along much needed competition to the largest market segment in the graphics business.
Quadro FX Go Technically, the chip owns 40 stream processors which are able to manage vertex- geometric or pixelshader operations.
ATI Radeon HD XT graphics card Specs – CNET
So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. Radeon RX X Laptop. Overall, the Radeon HD XT stayed sufficiently close to the GeForce GT for most of the non-taxing benchmarks to be a viable alternative though we won’t recommend either card for aspiring gamers.
Iris Pro Graphics Mobility Radeon HD Crossfire. Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
Radeon RX Desktop. As such, the Radeon HD XT seems to be a versatile graphics card for the coming HD era, even if its raw performance doesn’t seem to translate too well in the games and benchmarks tested.